Agreement clarifications

The new Agreement appears to have ambiguity between the ProJucer and the JUCE Framework/SDK… I was wondering if these could be addressed…

Clause 3 (c)

This clearly needs some differentiation between the JUCE API source code and the ProJucer software. In fact clauses 3 (c) through (f) all seem to apply to Projucer and need some differentiation to allow the licensee to actually use the API.

I’m sure there are other places in the Agreement where differentiation is required.



Thank you, Rail. 

The clause 3, Restrictions states at the beginnining the following:

3. Restrictions

Except as expressly set out in this Licence or as permitted by any local law, you undertake: 

In this instance, exceptions apply to the source code, as set in clause 2.2.b

develop and modify the Software as closed-source to enable the development of Licensee Content;