API consistency for juce::Point<int>

[aamf]

@sudara

introducing juce::Point’s sibling, juce::Dimensions

Yes! But I would go for juce::Size instead of juce::Dimensions. It is shorter and more consistent with existing methods, such as juce::Rectangle::setSize().

The addition of such a class is briefly discussed here, by the way:

Rectangle::getSize() missing

IIRC the reason I didn’t do that was some kind of symbol clash (this was many years ago). Probably would be something we could add now without any problem though, and yes, agreed that it’d be nice.