I didn’t notice any topics, but is there a preferred way to cite JUCE in an academic journal? While a standard form might be:
Storer, J. (2011). JUCE: Jules’ Utility Class Extensions (Version 1.52). Available at: http://www.rawmaterialsoftware.com/juce.php
you are certainly entitled to specify otherwise.
If possible could you please describe the circumstances surrounding the citation? I’m interested 
Ya, sure - I wrote an experimental medical monitoring tool for anesthesiologists using JUCE. We are reporting some results, and since it is a semi-technical article I think a citation is appropriate :!: I’m of course excited to share the awesomeness of JUCE with whoever will listen.
Screenshots ?
still a WIP … preliminary findings to be presented at IARS 2011 Annual Meeting
[color=#0000FF][size=200]AWESOME![/size][/color]
[quote]While a standard form might be:
Storer, J. (2011). JUCE: Jules’ Utility Class Extensions (Version 1.52). Available at: http://www.rawmaterialsoftware.com/juce.php
[/quote]
Sounds good to me!
Hi Jules (and others)
I just wanted to follow-up on this previous post. The article was finally published. Is this the first use of JUCE as medical research software :?:
http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/content/114/3/576.abstract
If you’re interested in a pdf, Jules, let me know.
Great screenshot!
Also, if you want to make a software synth in the future, you are already half-way there! Actually, I don’t think you’ll need to change the GUI at all, and the parameter names are just perfect.
I wonder how it works…
Amplitude and Saturation, those make sense. And Heart Rate, that must be the BPM – right?
Harmony sounds cool. I’m not sure about Systolic BP, is that a new kind of band-pass filter?
Noise and Amp Mod make sense too, and there is also Pulse Width modulation in there, cool. I can’t figure out what SpO2 does though.
LOL true true. And he’s got the audio configuration controls baked right into the main window. Thumbs up!
Hello,
I’m preparing an engineering brief for the upcoming AES conference and I have the same question. So far my citations looks as follows:
J. Storer, JUCE: Jules’ Utility Class Extensions [computer software, version 1.51], London, UK: Raw Material Software Ltd., 2010.
I was hesitating if I should use “J. Storer” or “Raw Material Software Ltd.” as the author. What’s your opinion on this?
Best regards,
Fritz
[quote=“fritz”]Hello,
I’m preparing an engineering brief for the upcoming AES conference and I have the same question. So far my citations looks as follows:
J. Storer, JUCE: Jules’ Utility Class Extensions [computer software, version 1.51], London, UK: Raw Material Software Ltd., 2010.
I was hesitating if I should use “J. Storer” or “Raw Material Software Ltd.” as the author. What’s your opinion on this?
Best regards,
Fritz[/quote]
Any of those sound fine to me, thanks!
[quote=“oygosound”]Hi Jules (and others)
I just wanted to follow-up on this previous post. The article was finally published. Is this the first use of JUCE as medical research software :?:
http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/content/114/3/576.abstract
If you’re interested in a pdf, Jules, let me know.[/quote]
No, I’ve been using it for medical research for quite a few years. I don’t believe JUCE has ever explicitly been named in any papers by my lab, but a few screenshots would certainly give it away.
I did see at least one other poster sometime back who was also evaluating JUCE for medical applications. S/he was interested in tying in with VTK[1], so obviously 3D visualization stuff or realtime CAD. Not sure where that went.
[1] which if I can ever free myself of nasty PHP[2] projects, I’d like to get back into also.
[2] The Devil’s own programming language.
Now 12 years later, what would be the current way to cite JUCE in a paper?
Would that be acceptable (assuming we’re talking about a 7.x or 8.x version released this year)?
J. Storer, JUCE: Jules’ Utility Class Extensions [computer software, version x.xx], London, UK: Raw Material Software Ltd., 2024.
