# MidiMessageSequence and updateMatchedPairs

**URL:** <https://forum.juce.com/t/midimessagesequence-and-updatematchedpairs/8600>\
**Category:** General JUCE discussion\
**Created:** [April 29, 2012, 1:31pm UTC](https://forum.juce.com/t/midimessagesequence-and-updatematchedpairs/8600 "2012-04-29T13:31:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jules](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/41988e/32.png) [@jules](https://forum.juce.com/u/jules)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2012, 9:09am UTC](https://forum.juce.com/t/midimessagesequence-and-updatematchedpairs/8600/2 "2012-04-30T09:09:43Z")

</div>

Yes, the existing behaviour is deliberately done like that, because that’s how midi sequences work: a note-on following another similar note-on is never ignored.

But yes, your suggestion about returning the new object is totally reasonable, I’ll add that for you!

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.juce.com/t/midimessagesequence-and-updatematchedpairs/8600)._