Site navigation

Quirky text formatting when calling toUpperCase on translated string

General JUCE discussion
#1

I’m translating my English app to Spanish. If I call:

TRANS("some string who's resulting translation includes accents or tildes").toUpperCase();

the accented/tilded letters stay in lower case. Here’s an example with a tilded “n”:

24%20PM

My current workaround is to just manually type the Spanish string in as uppercase in the translation file. But sometimes I use a string in more than one place in the app, one in lowercase, the other in uppercase, so that workaround isn’t always feasible.

Is there a way around this?

#2

For now I’ve added some manual replacements to the end of toUpperCase():

String String::toUpperCase() const
{
    StringCreationHelper builder (text);

    for (;;)
    {
        auto c = builder.source.toUpperCase();
        builder.write (c);

        if (c == 0)
            break;

        ++(builder.source);
    }
    
    String str = static_cast<String&&> (builder.result);
    
    str = str.replace("ñ", "Ñ");
    str = str.replace("á", "Á");
    str = str.replace("é", "É");
    str = str.replace("í", "Í");
    str = str.replace("ó", "Ó");
    str = str.replace("ú", "Ú");
    
    return str;
}
#3

if there isn’t a very good reason to dynamically change the case for purposes of translation it is beneficial to use upper case string literals where ever upper case text should appear. a lot of languages have edge cases. frequently quoted ones are e.g. in german the letter ß would be SS in upper case or the letter i in turkish becomes İ.

#4

Fair enough

#5

FWIW we just call the std library’s upper/lower case conversion, so not really much we can do about that if it’s not performing as expected.

#6

Which means, that the C-locale is used:
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/string/byte/toupper

Would it be possible to add a String function to select an appropriate locale?

#7

Why would we need to add anything to String for that? Could be done just by calling the appropriate std functions in your own code, I think?

#8

True indeed, there is a workaround. My thinking was more so you don’t have to mix juce::String and std::String back and forth. But one can live without juce::String, if that’s the way to go :wink: