Thanks for the feedback. In your opinion, does my case call for shared pointers, or would unique or even simple pointers do? Just to flesh it out a little more,
- Every node points to its parent (one) and its children (multiple)
- Nodes can be moved from one point in the tree to another
- If a node is deleted, all of its children are also deleted.
Originally I was using OwnedArray for the children and a raw pointer for the parent. I thought I’d try shared pointers because they seemed safer, but now I’m wondering whether it might actually be over complicating things.