Coding standards

Just because I saw it in my emails:
I suppose you used clang-format at some point? Anyway, love almost all of them, especially the one with const type& (for the same). I actually think this is the proper way of doing things, the exception of * is due to the C past, & is handled properly, as part of the type definition, so to makes far more sense to have const Type& v than const Type &v.

1 Like