FFT improvements in the pipeline?


#1

I’ve seen in the documentation and on the forum that there may be improvements/optimizations to the FFT class in the future, I’m just wondering if those will happen in JUCE 5. Regarding improvements besides optimizations, using std::complex instead of a custom complex data type so we could use double/fixed/custom precision data types with the FFT would be awesome.

In addition, will the FFT stay just an FFT, or will there be any development towards implementing DHT, DCT, auto/cross correlation, or other common DSP functionality based on the FFT?


#2

…like the one scheduled for JUCE 4? I doubt, they will dare to announce that once more before it is ready-ready…

But prove me wrong, please :slight_smile: