Now that's 2017... are we dropping C++98?

[jonathonracz]

Another thing to bring up… would a move to C++11 also mean that types like String/Array/every other JUCE container will finally return a proper size_t instead of int?

String, Y U NO construct with size_t?

Because MSVC. I have attempted to add that overload in the past, but it just confuses all of the older MS compilers, which use a typedef to define size_t as int, so it thinks you’re multiply-defining the constructor. And IIRC trying to use #ifdefs to only enable the overload on proper compilers caused other knock-on problems… It was certainly a total can of worms, I’m afraid. One day, when everyone’s on VC2010 and later, I’ll bring it back.