Anyone interested in developing free and open-source plugins?

the screen area is undefined. my plugins are fully resizable. and honestly i’d make this one quite big if i were you, to have more precision on the EQ pad.

anyway here’s another plugin with a design where the signal chain doesn’t follow the visible parameters:


a wavetable oscillator works like this:

  1. reading the phase from the wavetable
  2. remapping the phase (or even spectral properties) in various ways
  3. outputting the sound with added gain and pan

musically/workflow-wise the layout makes total sense, though. you have the most important oscillator features on the left and the optional fancy extra stuff on the right. seems to be less about travel distance and more about parameter relevance here, but the same logic would work for Manta’s design.

here we have ff saturn, a popular multiband saturation plugin. not the latest version, but doesn’t matter. i selected a band, gave it some drive and some of that “tone” EQ. what comes first? the drive or the EQ? maybe the drive, because all the red colour of it is higher in the UI. but maybe the EQ, because the interface of the selected band is in front of the red background colours. i have used this plugin for years and still no idea^^ what about the feedback/freq thing? does the comb filter come before the distortion or after it? despite an unclear signal chain design, the plugin is a well composed evergreen of plugin history.


Echobode is one of my favourite delays. especially before I switched to Bitwig it was the only way to have a frequency shifter in the feedback path of a delay. I’d consider the delay to be the first step in the signal chain, because everything else is basically in the delay. then ofc there is the big part, the frequency shifter, on the right of the interface. and a few additional things on the left, filters and smear (some sort of early reflections thingie). let’s ignore the modulation. modulation is rarely arranged as part of the signal chain anyway. but even the rest of the interface doesn’t say “read this from left to right” or “from top to bottom” but more like “mostly top to bottom, but the entire right side is for the main feature, because that’s where you will spend most of your time”

my personal conclusion is: it’s cool when you can arrange a UI just like the signal chain. but there can be exceptions when parameter relevance and mouse travel distance becomes more important, and it’s a bit subjective when that’s the case

OK, valid points…anyway, it’s your plugin. Cheers. :wink:

I agree with you. Only the JUCE team deserves real money :wink:

Totally off topic but has anybody tried this particular windows certificate: Code Signing Certificates - SSL.com ? I’m desperately trying to avoid getting overcharged for this.

1 Like

There is a lot of uncertainity about OV certificates. They will continue showing the smart screen warnings, until your product was installed often enough to trust it. EV on the other hand doesn’t need this phase to build up trust and will not show a smart screen warning.

I used the certificate from GlobalSign which worked well for me. But there the OV was only a tiny bit cheaper than EV so it made no sense.
The SSL OV you posted here is compared to that affordable, but it will take a few weeks to months until it doesn’t show the warning scaring your users away.

Unfortunately there is no official statement on how many downloads are necessary.

I suppose if we want to go into more detail it deserves a new thread

1 Like

There’s also a thread looking at Azure’s new Code signing certs. This might be the way forward for Plugins and other installers since its a LOT cheaper that other OV and EV certs afaik.

2 Likes